Federal vote Doubts about BVG reform and biodiversity initiative lead to rejection

The electorate rejected both the BVG reform and the biodiversity initiative. The reform was perceived as inadequate, while the pressure on biodiversity was perceived as too low.

The latest Vox analysis shows that the electorate rejected both the BVG reform and the biodiversity initiative on September 22. The reform of the occupational pension scheme, which aimed to improve the position of low-income earners, was seen by many as insufficient. Voters did not want to accept a reduction in BVG pensions, particularly in times of inflation. This rejection came not only from the left-wing camp, but also from almost two thirds of SVP and centrist supporters who opposed their own party's slogan.

BVG reform: a controversial goal

The central aim of the BVG reform, to improve the position of low-income earners, was met with skepticism. According to the Vox analysis by the research institute gfs.bern, the proposal was not convincing enough for many. Concerns about pension cuts during a period of inflation contributed significantly to the rejection. These concerns were shared by all parties, which led to a broad consensus against the reform.

Biodiversity initiative: lack of pressure on the issue

In the case of the biodiversity initiative, the perceived pressure of the problem was a decisive factor in the No. The initiators were unable to adequately convey the urgency of their concerns. Opponents from the center-right spectrum were of the opinion that enough was already being done for biodiversity and that additional pressure on agriculture was not justified. This conviction contributed significantly to the rejection of the initiative.

SDA